[Op-Ed] Ann Cuisia: How the CADENA Act Finally Gets the Point

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. BitPinas has no commercial relationship with any mentioned entity unless otherwise stated.

📬 Get the biggest crypto stories in the Philippines and Southeast Asia every week — subscribe to the BitPinas Newsletter.

By Ann Cuisia
(Republished with permission from the author. Originally posted on the author’s blog.)

The Blockchain CADENA Act has evolved. In this opinion piece, technologist Ann Cuisia argues that by shifting focus from prescribing technology like blockchain to embedding timeless principles of traceability and accountability, the bill has become a true governance milestone — one that finally prioritizes outcomes over tools.

When I first wrote “Why Blockchain the Budget Misses the Point,” my position was clear: technology alone does not create transparency. Laws must be principle-based and outcome-driven ensuring traceability, accountability, and citizen access regardless of which system or vendor runs it.

The newly refined CADENA Act (Senate Bill No. 1330) finally gets that point. It recognizes that what matters most is not using blockchain, but embedding transparency and auditability into government spending itself. This is a welcome shift from tech prescription to governance reform.

From buzzwords to principles

Advertisement

The CADENA Act no longer insists on a single technology. Instead, it establishes clear rules for how government transactions must be recorded and disclosed in verifiable, tamper-evident form. That distinction future-proofs the law. It can evolve with technology without losing its purpose which is to make every peso traceable from appropriation to disbursement.

A case study in public-sector openness

What stands out most is Senator Bam Aquino’s openness to feedback. Instead of defending an early draft, he welcomed input from technologists, civic organizations, and the private sector. The result is a bill that aligns with both innovation and accountability, showing that public consultation, when genuine, produces better legislation.

I spoke up not as a proponent of technology, but as a taxpayer who believes that laws must be timeless and free from commercial bias. Seeing these principles reflected in the latest version of CADENA proves that constructive dialogue between citizens and government still works.

The path ahead

There is still work to be done. Implementation will test whether transparency becomes a lived practice or remains an aspiration. Agencies must publish, not just collect, data. Standards, interoperability, and independent oversight will determine success.

But for now, this is progress worth recognizing. The CADENA Act has evolved from a technology experiment into a governance milestone one that finally gets the point: transparency is not about the tool, it’s about outcomes.

This op-ed is published on BitPinas: [Op-Ed] Ann Cuisia: How the CADENA Act Finally Gets the Point

What else is happening in Crypto Philippines and beyond?